EV/EBITDA: when it is more honest than P/E
intermediate
Automated material · TradeAlmanac editorial deskPrepared by a language model from our stored data and checked by an editor.
P/E (price to earnings) looks only at the shareholders' part of a business and ignores debt. Two companies with identical profit but different leverage get the same multiple — even though the buyer of the first gets a business and the buyer of the second gets a business together with a loan.
What EV/EBITDA fixes
EV/EBITDA puts the value of the whole enterprise in the numerator: capitalisation plus net debt. In the denominator sits profit before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation — that is, before capital structure had a chance to affect it.
5,89
The result is comparable across companies with different leverage — something P/E (price to earnings) cannot do by construction.
Where it fails
For banks. Debt is not a burden for a bank but its raw material: it raises money in order to place it. Adding that debt to enterprise value is meaningless, and the multiple does not apply to banks at all.
With negative EBITDA. Dividing by a near-zero figure produces an absurdly large number that looks like a valuation.
Read it alongside leverage
1,50
A low EV/EBITDA with high debt is not cheapness but payment for risk.
Related instruments
Prepared by a language model from our stored data and checked by an editor.
How we use language modelsSimilar articles
- Corporate liquidity: how it differs from solvencyThe ability to pay now and the ability to repay at all are different properties, and the first kills more often.
- How to read analyst researchA target price is not a forecast but a function of assumptions. Read the assumptions, not the conclusion.
- How to compare two companies: the order of checksA sequence that stops you settling on the first metric that happens to look favourable.
- When multiples stop workingLosses, one-off items, negative equity and industry specifics render the familiar ratios meaningless.