Top Crypto Losers: What a Daily Drop Measures and What It Does Not Tell You
· 5 min · beginner
Automated material · TradeAlmanac editorial deskDraft prepared by a language model from our stored data; not reviewed by an editor.
The list below answers one question: which cryptocurrencies in the platform's database have fallen further than the rest over the past day. It is sorted by price change over a rolling daily window, in ascending order, so the deepest loss sits at the top. This is a measurement of price and of price alone: neither trading volume, nor market capitalisation, nor the quality of the project is part of the criterion, and none of them affects the order of the rows.
| # | Security | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRASSTouch Grass | −99.97 % |
| 2 | WIFRobinWifHat | −99.87 % |
| 3 | TATA FUND | −99.03 % |
| 4 | MONMON Protocol | −98.80 % |
| 5 | TRUMPMAGA | −98.30 % |
| 6 | GMRTThe Game Company | −98.13 % |
| 7 | DEEPDeepstate | −90.15 % |
| 8 | WSOSWorld Strategic Oil Supply | −83.43 % |
| 9 | ASTROastronaut | −81.86 % |
| 10 | PROSProsper [OLD] | −73.90 % |
As of trading date: 10/10/2026
What exactly is calculated
We take the price of the asset at the moment the page is served and its price exactly one day earlier, calculate the relative change, and rank the rows from worst to best. The key difference from the familiar "day" on the stock market is that cryptocurrencies have no trading session: the market runs without weekends and without a clearing break. So a "day" here is not a calendar day with an open and a close, but a moving window that shifts with every update. The same asset can drop out of the list and come back into it within a single day, simply because a sharp stretch of the move has fallen out of the window.
For comparison: in Russian equities the daily change is tied to the closing prices of the exchange session, and the line-up of top losers changes in discrete steps. In cryptocurrencies the edge of the window is arbitrary, and the shorter the period, the more of the result is down to chance.
What you cannot conclude from this list
This is not a list of "cheap" assets, and still less a list of candidates to buy. A deep loss over the day says only that the price moved down faster than the others did, and it says nothing about the reason. The reasons can be entirely unlike one another in meaning: a token unlock under the emission schedule, the departure of a market maker, a delisting from a major venue, a protocol hack, a pullback after an equally sharp rally the day before, or simply a single large trade in an illiquid order book.
The second common trap is the thin-market effect. The lower the turnover, the cheaper it is to move the price, and illiquid assets systematically end up in the upper part of a ranking like this. Their fall often means not "the market has repriced the project" but "there was no buyer in the order book". The sorting criterion does not tell these two apart, so it is the reader who has to.
Third: the absence of an asset from the list does not mean that all is well with it. An asset that declines slowly and steadily for weeks will never make it into a daily snapshot, yet its accumulated drawdown may turn out to be larger than that of any row above.
How to read this list
Start with whether the market as a whole is falling. If a broad front of assets is heading down, you are looking at a general risk-off move, and the individual names in the table are simply assets with a higher sensitivity to the overall move, not carriers of bad news of their own. If, on the other hand, isolated rows are collapsing against a calm market, look for an event that concerns them specifically.
Next, check the liquidity of the asset, and only after that the news background. It is useful to set the move against the macro picture: the reports that move the crypto market and Russian assets at the same time are gathered in the news feed.
And lastly: change the period. A daily snapshot works well as an event detector, but it is poorly suited to drawing conclusions about a trend. The same asset can tell opposite stories over a day and over a quarter.
Why a cryptocurrency cannot be valued like a stock
A crypto asset has no issuer with financial statements, no revenue and no payouts to shareholders. The usual supports of fundamental analysis are missing here: you cannot look at quarterly reports, you cannot check the dividend calendar, and there is no coupon and no maturity date, as there is with OFZ. What remains is price, turnover and the rules of the protocol itself: the emission schedule, the burn mechanism, the unlock terms.
A practical conclusion follows from this: the fall of a crypto asset cannot be "checked against the balance sheet". Where with a stock you would compare the price with earnings and decide that the market had overdone it, in crypto there is no such anchor. The price is the entire valuation available.
What the data leaves out
The criterion of this ranking is narrow on purpose, and it is more honest to state its limits plainly. The order of the rows takes no account of turnover, of order book depth, of the number of venues where the asset is listed, or of which trading pair serves as the basis for the calculation. For stablecoins and wrapped tokens a daily deviation means something else altogether: more often a failure of the peg than a repricing. Definitions of the terms that appear in instrument descriptions are collected in the platform's glossary; collective investment instruments are in the funds section.
Use this list as a "look here" signal, not as a conclusion. On its own it answers exactly one question, namely where the price fell the most over the day, and any further question requires other data.
Draft prepared by a language model from our stored data; not reviewed by an editor.
Model: claude-opus-5
How we use language modelsSimilar articles
- The secondary market for DFAs: why the asset never leaves its own platformA DFA can be sold before redemption only inside the platform where it was issued, and only through an exchange operator listed in the Bank of Russia register. Why the asset cannot be moved to another operator, how selling it differs from placing an order in a bond's order book, and what the sale changes in the purchase limit and in the tax.
- Terms of Trade: How the Ratio of Export to Import Prices Moves the Rouble and ProfitsThe terms of trade are the ratio between the prices at which a country sells its exports and the prices at which it buys its imports.
- TWAP order: the algorithm slices volume by time, not by liquidityA TWAP order (time-weighted average price) is an instruction to the trading system: take a large order, break it into a stream of small child orders and release them in equal portions at equal intervals until the end of a set window.
- The Impossible Trinity: What a Central Bank Pays for a Fixed Exchange RateThe impossible trinity is the proposition that, out of the set of goals "fixed exchange rate", "free movement of capital" and "independent interest rate", a state can hold any combination except the complete set.